RTX 3050 - Order Now
Home / Blog / Cost & Pricing / RTX 4090 24 GB Self-Hosted vs Together AI: When Each One Wins
Cost & Pricing

RTX 4090 24 GB Self-Hosted vs Together AI: When Each One Wins

If you are deciding between renting an RTX 4090 24 GB and paying Together AI per token for the same models, here is the precise break-even math.

The RTX 4090 24 GB at £289/mo and Together AI’s per-token pricing cover overlapping use cases. This page is the precise comparison for the models you’d actually run on either.

TL;DR

Self-hosted 4090 wins on cost above ~2.5B output tokens/month for Mistral 7B-class models. Below that, Together AI is cheaper. For Llama 3 70B (which the 4090 cannot host single-card), Together always wins. The 4090 wins on data residency at any volume.

Models that fit a 4090 + are on Together

  • Mistral 7B Instruct — both
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct — both
  • Qwen 2.5 7B / 14B (INT4) — both
  • DeepSeek-Coder V2 Lite — both
  • Mixtral 8x7B INT4 — fits 4090 (tight); Together hosts FP16
  • Llama 3 70B — does NOT fit 4090; Together hosts

Cost-per-token comparison

Model4090 self-hosted (60% util)Together AI
Mistral 7B Instruct£0.20/1M£0.17/1M
Llama 3.1 8B£0.21/1M£0.17/1M
Qwen 2.5 14B INT4£0.34/1M£0.27/1M
DeepSeek-Coder V2 Lite INT4£0.30/1M£0.25/1M
Mixtral 8x7B INT4£0.62/1M£0.46/1M
Llama 3 70BDoes not fit£0.68/1M

Important: Together’s per-token price is 100% utilisation by definition. The 4090 numbers are at 60% utilisation. At 100% util the 4090 is genuinely cheaper.

Break-even token volume

For Mistral 7B Instruct:

  • 4090 monthly: £289.
  • Together at £0.17/1M: break-even = 1.74B tokens/month.
  • Below 1.74B tokens/month → Together is cheaper.
  • Above 1.74B tokens/month → 4090 is cheaper.

Non-cost factors

Cost-per-token isn’t the only variable:

  • Data residency — Together is US-hosted. UK/EU regulated workloads can’t use it.
  • Custom models — Together supports limited fine-tunes; self-hosting allows any LoRA, QLoRA, merged model.
  • Latency — UK → US adds 80–120 ms RTT. Local 4090 is ~5 ms.
  • Reliability — Together has had outages; self-hosted is your uptime.
  • Predictability — fixed monthly bill vs traffic-scaled bill.

Verdict

  • Below 1.5B tokens/mo, no residency need: Together AI.
  • Above 1.5B tokens/mo: RTX 4090 self-hosted.
  • Need data residency: 4090 always wins.
  • Need 70B-class: Together (4090 can’t host it).

Bottom line

For a steady production workload above ~1.5B tokens/mo of 7B–8B inference, the 4090 at £289/mo beats Together. For spiky or low-volume workloads, Together stays cheaper. The most resilient setup uses both: dedicated 4090 for steady traffic, Together for overflow.

Need a Dedicated GPU Server?

Deploy from RTX 3050 to RTX 5090. Full root access, NVMe storage, 1Gbps — UK datacenter.

Browse GPU Servers

gigagpu

We benchmark, deploy, and optimise GPU infrastructure for AI workloads. All data in our guides comes from real-world testing on our UK-based dedicated GPU servers.

Ready to deploy your AI workload?

Dedicated GPU servers from our UK datacenter. NVMe storage, 1Gbps networking, full root access.

Browse GPU Servers Contact Sales

Have a question? Need help?