RTX 3050 - Order Now
Home / Blog / GPU Comparisons / Best GPU for Embedding Generation (BERT, E5, BGE)
GPU Comparisons

Best GPU for Embedding Generation (BERT, E5, BGE)

Benchmark embedding throughput and cost-per-million-embeddings across 6 GPUs for BERT, E5, and BGE models. Find the fastest and most cost-efficient GPU for building vector indexes.

Why Embedding Generation Needs GPU Acceleration

Embedding models convert text into dense vector representations used by search engines, RAG pipelines, and recommendation systems. While individual embedding calls are fast, production workloads involve millions of documents. Generating embeddings for a 10-million-document corpus on CPU can take days; on a dedicated GPU server the same job finishes in hours.

GigaGPU’s infrastructure supports running embedding models alongside LLMs on the same GPU. Whether you are building indexes for FAISS, Qdrant, Weaviate, or ChromaDB, this guide helps you pick the right GPU for your embedding throughput and budget requirements.

Embedding Model Overview: BERT, E5, BGE

The three most popular embedding model families differ in size, quality, and GPU requirements. All are significantly faster on GPU than CPU.

ModelParametersDimensionsVRAM (FP16)Best For
BERT-base110M768~0.5 GBLegacy pipelines, fine-tuned models
E5-large-v2335M1024~1.2 GBHigh-quality retrieval
BGE-large-en-v1.5335M1024~1.2 GBRAG pipelines, LlamaIndex/LangChain
BGE-small-en-v1.533M384~0.2 GBLow-latency, edge deployment
E5-mistral-7b-instruct7B4096~14 GBHighest quality, compute-heavy

Most production RAG deployments use BGE-large or E5-large as the best balance of quality and speed. For the full RAG stack, see our best GPU for RAG pipelines guide.

Embedding Throughput Benchmarks by GPU

We benchmarked three popular models encoding 256-token passages at optimal batch size. Throughput is measured in passages per second.

BGE-large-en-v1.5 (335M params)

GPUVRAMPassages/sec (bs=64)Passages/sec (bs=256)Server $/hr
RTX 509032 GB2,8403,460$1.80
RTX 508016 GB1,9202,310$0.85
RTX 309024 GB1,3801,720$0.45
RTX 4060 Ti16 GB9801,180$0.35
RTX 40608 GB620740$0.20
RTX 30508 GB310370$0.10

E5-large-v2 (335M params)

GPUPassages/sec (bs=64)Passages/sec (bs=256)
RTX 50902,7803,390
RTX 50801,8702,260
RTX 30901,3501,680
RTX 4060 Ti9601,150
RTX 4060605720
RTX 3050300360

BERT-base (110M params)

GPUPassages/sec (bs=64)Passages/sec (bs=256)
RTX 50905,2006,850
RTX 50803,5104,620
RTX 30902,5403,350
RTX 4060 Ti1,8102,380
RTX 40601,1401,500
RTX 3050570750

Cost per Million Embeddings

We calculated the cost to embed one million 256-token passages using BGE-large at optimal batch size, assuming sustained throughput on a dedicated server.

GPUTime for 1M PassagesCost (1M Embeddings)OpenAI Equivalent
RTX 50904.8 min$0.144$0.10*
RTX 50807.2 min$0.102$0.10
RTX 30909.7 min$0.073$0.10
RTX 4060 Ti14.1 min$0.082$0.10
RTX 406022.5 min$0.075$0.10
RTX 305045.0 min$0.075$0.10

*OpenAI text-embedding-3-small at $0.02/1M tokens; 256 tokens per passage = ~$0.10 per 1M passages.

Self-hosting is cost-competitive even at relatively small scale, and the gap widens as volume increases. See our cost calculator for interactive estimates.

Batch Size Scaling and VRAM Usage

Larger batch sizes improve throughput but consume more VRAM. The embedding model weights are small, so batch size is the main VRAM driver. This matters when co-locating with an LLM for RAG pipelines.

Batch SizeVRAM (BGE-large)Throughput Gain vs bs=1
1~1.4 GB1x (baseline)
32~2.1 GB~8x
64~2.8 GB~12x
256~5.2 GB~15x
512~8.4 GB~16x

Integrating with RAG Pipelines and Vector Databases

Embeddings feed into vector databases for similarity search. The GPU handles embedding generation while the vector store handles indexing and retrieval. Popular pairings include BGE-large with Qdrant for filtered search, FAISS for raw speed, and ChromaDB for simplicity. See our vector database comparison for detailed trade-offs.

For the complete RAG orchestration layer, pair your embedding GPU with LangChain or LlamaIndex. Both frameworks support local embedding endpoints natively.

GPU Recommendations

Best overall: RTX 3090. At $0.45/hr the RTX 3090 embeds one million passages for $0.073, cheaper than OpenAI’s API. The 24 GB VRAM handles large batch sizes and still leaves room for an LLM on the same card.

Best for high-volume indexing: RTX 5090. If you regularly re-index millions of documents, the 5090’s 3,460 passages/sec at large batch sizes cuts indexing time significantly. Worth the premium for production RAG pipelines with frequent updates.

Best budget: RTX 4060. Embeds one million passages in 22 minutes for $0.075. Good for development and moderate-scale production workloads.

Best for co-located stacks: RTX 5080. The 16 GB VRAM supports running BGE-large alongside a quantised 7B LLM, keeping your entire LlamaIndex or LangChain stack on a single GPU.

Run Embedding Models on Dedicated GPUs

GigaGPU servers support sentence-transformers, TEI, and custom embedding endpoints. Generate millions of embeddings without API rate limits or per-token fees.

Browse GPU Servers

Need a Dedicated GPU Server?

Deploy from RTX 3050 to RTX 5090. Full root access, NVMe storage, 1Gbps — UK datacenter.

Browse GPU Servers

admin

We benchmark, deploy, and optimise GPU infrastructure for AI workloads. All data in our guides comes from real-world testing on our UK-based dedicated GPU servers.

Ready to deploy your AI workload?

Dedicated GPU servers from our UK datacenter. NVMe storage, 1Gbps networking, full root access.

Browse GPU Servers Contact Sales

Have a question? Need help?