RTX 3050 - Order Now
Home / Blog / Benchmarks / Bark TTS Latency by GPU
Benchmarks

Bark TTS Latency by GPU

Benchmark results for Bark text-to-speech latency across six GPUs measuring milliseconds to first audio and cost analysis for dedicated GPU hosting.

Bark TTS Benchmark Overview

Bark by Suno is an open text-to-speech model capable of generating highly natural speech with emotion, laughter, and non-verbal sounds. Unlike simpler TTS models, Bark uses a transformer architecture that is more compute-intensive but produces remarkably expressive audio. A dedicated GPU server is recommended for consistent low-latency speech generation.

All tests were conducted on GigaGPU servers measuring end-to-end latency (prompt to audio output) for a standard 15-word English sentence. Bark requires approximately 5 GB of VRAM. For comparisons with other TTS models, see our TTS latency benchmarks hub.

Latency Results by GPU

Lower latency is better. We measure milliseconds from text input to complete audio output.

GPUVRAMBark Latency (ms)Notes
RTX 30506 GB4,800msFits in VRAM but slow
RTX 40608 GB2,900msNoticeable delay
RTX 4060 Ti16 GB2,100msApproaching usable latency
RTX 309024 GB1,500msGood for non-real-time use
RTX 508016 GB950msSub-second generation
RTX 509032 GB620msBest latency tested

Bark is inherently slower than lightweight TTS models due to its autoregressive transformer architecture. The RTX 5090 at 620ms is the only GPU that achieves sub-second latency for a standard sentence, while the RTX 5080 comes close at 950ms.

Sentence Length Impact

Bark’s latency scales with output length. Below we compare short (8 words), medium (15 words), and long (30 words) sentences.

Sentence LengthRTX 3090 (ms)RTX 5090 (ms)
Short (8 words)850350
Medium (15 words)1,500620
Long (30 words)2,8001,150

Latency roughly doubles as sentence length doubles. For real-time applications, consider chunking long text into shorter segments and streaming audio output.

Cost Efficiency Analysis

We measure cost efficiency as inverse latency (generations per second) per pound of monthly hosting cost.

GPULatency (ms)Approx. Monthly CostGen/s per Pound
RTX 30504,800~£450.0046
RTX 40602,900~£600.0057
RTX 4060 Ti2,100~£750.0063
RTX 30901,500~£1100.0061
RTX 5080950~£1600.0066
RTX 5090620~£2500.0065

The RTX 5080 and RTX 5090 are nearly tied on cost efficiency, with the RTX 4060 Ti close behind. For the best GPU for TTS, the RTX 5080 offers the optimal balance.

GPU Recommendations

  • Budget: RTX 4060 Ti — 2.1 seconds per sentence is acceptable for non-real-time applications like audiobook generation.
  • Best value: RTX 5080 — sub-second latency at the best cost efficiency.
  • Lowest latency: RTX 5090 — 620ms enables near-interactive voice applications.
  • Alternative: For faster TTS, consider Kokoro TTS which trades expressiveness for speed.

Compare Bark with other TTS models in our XTTS-v2 latency benchmark or the Kokoro TTS results. Browse all benchmarks in the Benchmarks category.

Conclusion

Bark produces the most expressive open-source TTS audio available, but its transformer architecture means higher latency than lightweight models. For applications where voice quality and expressiveness matter more than raw speed, Bark on a dedicated GPU server with an RTX 5080 or RTX 5090 is the recommended setup.

Deploy Bark TTS on Dedicated Hardware

GPU servers optimised for text-to-speech workloads with low latency and full root access.

Browse GPU Servers

Need a Dedicated GPU Server?

Deploy from RTX 3050 to RTX 5090. Full root access, NVMe storage, 1Gbps — UK datacenter.

Browse GPU Servers

admin

We benchmark, deploy, and optimise GPU infrastructure for AI workloads. All data in our guides comes from real-world testing on our UK-based dedicated GPU servers.

Ready to deploy your AI workload?

Dedicated GPU servers from our UK datacenter. NVMe storage, 1Gbps networking, full root access.

Browse GPU Servers Contact Sales

Have a question? Need help?