RTX 3050 - Order Now
Home / Blog / Benchmarks / Gemma 2 9B on RTX 3050: Performance Benchmark & Cost, Category: Benchmarks, Slug: gemma-2-9b-on-rtx-3050-benchmark, Excerpt: Gemma 2 9B benchmarked on RTX 3050: 8.4 tok/s at 4-bit GGUF Q4_K_M, VRAM usage, cost per 1M tokens, and deployment configuration., Internal links: 9 –>
Benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B on RTX 3050: Performance Benchmark & Cost, Category: Benchmarks, Slug: gemma-2-9b-on-rtx-3050-benchmark, Excerpt: Gemma 2 9B benchmarked on RTX 3050: 8.4 tok/s at 4-bit GGUF Q4_K_M, VRAM usage, cost per 1M tokens, and deployment configuration., Internal links: 9 –>

Gemma 2 9B benchmarked on RTX 3050: 8.4 tok/s at 4-bit GGUF Q4_K_M, VRAM usage, cost per 1M tokens, and deployment configuration.

Running a 9-billion-parameter model on a 6 GB GPU sounds like a recipe for frustration. In practice, Google’s Gemma 2 9B does squeeze onto the RTX 3050 — barely — and still delivers usable inference speeds. We tested the limits on a GigaGPU dedicated server.

What 8.4 Tokens per Second Feels Like

MetricValue
Tokens/sec (single stream)8.4 tok/s
Tokens/sec (batched, bs=8)10.9 tok/s
Per-token latency119.0 ms
PrecisionINT4
Quantisation4-bit GGUF Q4_K_M
Max context length4K
Performance ratingAcceptable

Benchmark: 512-token prompt, 256-token completion, single-stream, llama.cpp with Q4_K_M GGUF. At 8.4 tok/s, responses trickle in rather than stream — think two to three words per second. Good enough for development, but you will feel the wait in interactive sessions.

The VRAM Squeeze

ComponentVRAM
Model weights (4-bit GGUF Q4_K_M)6.4 GB
KV cache + runtime~1.0 GB
Total RTX 3050 VRAM6 GB
Free headroom~0.0 GB

There is effectively zero headroom. The model itself exceeds the 6 GB card, so llama.cpp spills some layers to system RAM via partial offloading. Keep context short (4K max) and avoid concurrent requests or you will hit out-of-memory crashes. This is a single-stream, short-context-only configuration.

Cost at This Tier

Cost MetricValue
Server cost£0.25/hr (£49/mo)
Cost per 1M tokens£8.267
Tokens per £1120,963
Break-even vs API~1 req/day

At £8.27 per million tokens, the 3050 is not the most efficient way to run Gemma 2 9B — the higher-end cards achieve much lower per-token costs. Batching helps a little, bringing the rate down to around £5.17/M. Still, at £49/mo, the entry price is hard to beat if your budget is tight. See our tok/s benchmark tool to weigh your options.

Should You Bother?

The RTX 3050 makes sense for Gemma 2 9B in exactly two scenarios: local development where you need to validate prompts and outputs before deploying to a bigger GPU, and very low-volume internal tasks where latency does not matter. For anything resembling production, step up to at least the RTX 4060 Ti for a much smoother experience.

Get started:

docker run --gpus all -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:server -m /models/gemma-2-9b.Q4_K_M.gguf --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8080 -ngl 99

Full walkthrough in the Gemma hosting guide. Related: best GPU for LLM inference, cheapest GPUs for AI, and all benchmark results.

Try Gemma 2 9B on the RTX 3050

Lowest-cost entry point for 9B inference. UK datacentre, root access, £49/mo flat.

Order RTX 3050 Server

Need a Dedicated GPU Server?

Deploy from RTX 3050 to RTX 5090. Full root access, NVMe storage, 1Gbps — UK datacenter.

Browse GPU Servers

gigagpu

We benchmark, deploy, and optimise GPU infrastructure for AI workloads. All data in our guides comes from real-world testing on our UK-based dedicated GPU servers.

Ready to deploy your AI workload?

Dedicated GPU servers from our UK datacenter. NVMe storage, 1Gbps networking, full root access.

Browse GPU Servers Contact Sales

Have a question? Need help?