RTX 3050 - Order Now
Home / Blog / Benchmarks / Gemma 2 9B Benchmark on the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
Benchmarks

Gemma 2 9B Benchmark on the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB

Gemma 2 9B at FP16 is 18 GB — too big for a 16 GB card. At FP8 it fits comfortably. Real benchmarks for the FP8 deployment.

Gemma 2 9B (Google) is the "safety-tuned, reasoning-strong" option in the 9B class. The 18 GB FP16 footprint puts it just over a 16 GB card, but FP8 brings it into reach.

TL;DR

Gemma 2 9B at FP8 fits the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB with ~6 GB headroom for KV cache. ~620 tok/s aggregate, ~58 tok/s single-stream. AWQ-INT4 is even more efficient.

VRAM fit

PrecisionWeightsKV poolConcurrent users
FP1618 GBDoes not fitn/a
FP89 GB~6 GB~20
AWQ-INT46 GB~9 GB~30

Benchmark results

PrecisionAggregate tok/sSingle-streamTTFT
FP862058230 ms
AWQ-INT472064210 ms

Verdict

Gemma 2 9B on a 5060 Ti is a credible deployment at FP8 or INT4. For applications that benefit from Gemma's safety tuning (customer-facing chatbots, regulated workloads), it's a reasonable pick.

Bottom line

Gemma 2 9B FP8 on a 5060 Ti at £119/mo. See best GPU for Gemma.

Need a Dedicated GPU Server?

Deploy from RTX 3050 to RTX 5090. Full root access, NVMe storage, 1Gbps — UK datacenter.

Browse GPU Servers

gigagpu

We benchmark, deploy, and optimise GPU infrastructure for AI workloads. All data in our guides comes from real-world testing on our UK-based dedicated GPU servers.

Ready to deploy your AI workload?

Dedicated GPU servers from our UK datacenter. NVMe storage, 1Gbps networking, full root access.

Browse GPU Servers Contact Sales

Have a question? Need help?